To these ends, the paper provides a checklist of transparency criteria that should be completed by modelers. A 2016 paper contends that model-based energy scenario studies, seeking to influence decision-makers in government and industry, must become more comprehensible and more transparent.
#VSPD 032 CODE#
: 17 To further honor the process of peer review, researchers argue, in a 2012 paper, that it is essential to place both the source code and datasets under publicly accessible version control so that third-parties can run, verify, and scrutinize specific models.
#VSPD 032 VERIFICATION#
Ī 2010 paper concerning energy efficiency modeling argues that "an open peer review process can greatly support model verification and validation, which are essential for model development". The use of open energy system models and open energy data represents one attempt to improve the transparency, comprehensibility, and reproducibility of energy system models, particularly those used to aid public policy development. See also: Open Energy Modelling Initiative § Context Transparency, comprehensibility, and reproducibility As of March 2017, this article lists 25 such undertakings (with a further six waiting to be added).Ĭhang et al (2021) survey modeling trends and find the open to closed division about even after reviewing 54 frameworks - although that interpretation is based on project count and not on uptake and use. : 5861 Balmorel was also active at that time, having been made public in 2001. Just two projects were cited in a 2011 paper on the topic: OSeMOSYS and TEMOA. Open energy system modeling came of age in the 2010s.
: 214 The authors also conclude that, in terms of openness, energy research has lagged behind other fields, most notably physics, biotechnology, and medicine. : 211–213 The paper makes a number of recommendations for projects wishing to transition to a more open approach. : 1 The projects listed here are deemed suitable for inclusion through having pending or published academic literature or by being reported in secondary sources.Ī 2017 paper lists the benefits of open data and models and discusses the reasons that many projects nonetheless remain closed. The absence of a license agreement creates a state of legal uncertainty whereby potential users cannot know which limitations the owner may want to enforce in the future.
#VSPD 032 SOFTWARE#
This article does not cover projects which simply make their source code or spreadsheets available for public download, but which omit a recognized free and open-source software license. Model development is therefore usually a team effort and constituted as either an academic project, a commercial venture, or a genuinely inclusive community initiative. There is also a desire to leverage the benefits that open data and open software development can bring, including reduced duplication of effort, better sharing of ideas and information, improved quality, and wider engagement and adoption. There is an increasing interest in making public policy energy models more transparent to improve their acceptance by policymakers and the public.
#VSPD 032 DRIVERS#
Several drivers favor the development of open models and open data. The open energy modeling projects listed here fall exclusively within the bottom-up paradigm, in which a model is a relatively literal representation of the underlying system.
See also: Energy modeling and Open-source software development Organization
0 kommentar(er)
